-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Analysis of measurement data from Solenoid without iron box Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 11:44:24 -0700 From: Michael BarnesOrganization: TRIUMF To: Nathan Rodning CC: John Macdonald , drgill@triumf.ca,Ewart Blackmore , Doug Evans Hi Nate, This email is to let you know the results of an analysis of data, measured in November 1998 by Doug Evans, for the E614 solenoid (not in an iron box). The analysis has been carried out for data taken on the central axis of the solenoid (X=0 & Y=0). The two measurement data files analyzed are: 1) 111098.2 (serial plate facing south): this corresponds to -Zmagnet on the attached plots [Doug tells me that the serial plate was upstream (i.e. -Ztwist) for the measurements taken in the iron box] 2) 111898.2 (serial plate facing north). The "polarity" of Z coordinates in file 111898.2 are w.r.t. to the position of the magnet mapping equipment; in order to obtain Zmagnet the Z coordinate in 111898.2 was multiplied by -1. Similarly the flux density was multiplied by -1. In the four attached PostScript files: a) "BG 111098.2" is the measured Bz flux density versus Zmagnet; b) "BG 111098.2. Data flattened between -25.4cm & -25.4cm" is the measured Bz flux density after the slope has been mathematically removed. To remove the slope, the gradient (kG/cm) has been calculated between -25.4cm & 25.4cm: a correction to each measured field value is calculated by multiplying this slope by the corresponding Zmagnet coordinate. c) "BG 111898.2 [solenoid turned around]" is the measured Bz flux density (multiplied by -1) versus Zmagnet; d) "BG 111898.2 [solenoid turned around]. Data flattened between -25.4cm & -25.4cm" is the measured Bz flux density after the slope has been mathematically removed (see "b" for details). e) "(BG 111098.2 - BG 111898.2)/2" is the average of curves "a" and "c" (i.e. the average of the field before the slope is corrected for). The above five curves are shown in files: FullData.ps (Zmagnet range from -75cm to +75cm); LimitData.ps (Zmagnet range from -55cm to +55cm); +Z.ps (Zmagnet range from +55cm to +75cm); -Z.ps (Zmagnet range from -55cm to -75cm); In order to determine whether the coils are centered, w.r.t. to the outer shell of the solenoid, the values of Zmagnet where the flux density crosses 1.82kG (arbitrarily chosen value) have been noted: Curve "BG 111098.2. Data flattened between -25.4cm & -25.4cm" crosses 1.82kG at Zmagnet of -73.75cm (see -Z.ps) and 74.52cm (see +Z.ps); this infers that the coils are off center by approx. +0.39cm [(74.52-73.75)/2]. "BG 111898.2 [solenoid turned around]. Data flattened between -25.4cm & -25.4cm" crosses 1.82kG at Zmagnet of -74.13cm (see -Z.ps) and 74.79cm (see +Z.ps); this infers that the coils are off center by approx. +0.33cm [(74.79-74.13)/2]. "(BG 111098.2 - BG 111898.2)/2" crosses 1.82kG at Zmagnet of -73.90cm (see -Z.ps) and 74.66cm (see +Z.ps); this infers that the coils are off center by approx. +0.38cm [(74.66-73.90)/2]. (Note: the measurement data was taken in Z increments of 1 inch [2.54cm]). >From the above it appears that the coil was off-centre, w.r.t. to the outer vacuum vessel, by a distance of approx. +0.35cm (in the direction of +Zmagnet). The direction of the coil being off centre is consistent with the direction of displacement (+Ztwist) of the recent measurements in the iron box. However the magnitude of the displacement of the coil is very different in the magnet box (approx. 2cm to 3cm) Cheers, Mike Barnes