From: John Schaapman <jsch@relay.phys.ualberta.ca>
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 11:26:30 -0600 (MDT)
To: e614electronics@relay.phys.ualberta.ca
Cc: John Schaapman <jsch@relay.phys.ualberta.ca>
Subject: Prototype Tests, Part 1

Postamp/Discriminator First Stage Prototype Tests, Part 1

this is a reposting attempt

John Schaapman                     Ph: 780-492-3043
Centre for Subatomic Research     Fax: 780-492-3408
University of Alberta            NOTE: new area code
Edmonton, AB
CANADA       T6G 2N5

    E614    Postamp/Discriminator -  First Stage Prototype Comparison



        By investigating the proposed circuits with fast risetime pulses, some circuit changes were developed aimed mainly at reducing crosstalk. These changes were made before the following tests were undertaken.



1. There was crosstalk between the two sections of the comparator due to the enable circuit even though there are separate enable inputs. Permanently enabling both channels stops this with no observable disadvantages.

2. Lowering the impedance at both comparator input polarities to about 100 ohms seems to reduce crosstalk dramatically. This means that the threshold circuit  becomes an attenuator and requires some current. The threshold trimpot cicruit  was changed to provide this. 

3. It was found that the series output resistor for the inverting amp stage was not needed.



Note: The capacitor which adjusts the minimum output width was removed for these

           tests to more easily show the relation between input pulse width and output.





A. Characteristics of VTX Preamp Output at input to cable and at postamp input with termination consisting of 1 K and ac coupled 53.6 ohm only. 

                                 ( no connection to first stage )



Fig 1.  Shows Full Scale signal.  [ 2 db attenuator setting in test setup ]

             Cable attenuation - 412 mv input , 360 mv output = 1.33 db

             Cable Delay         -  19 nsec



Fig 2.  Crosstalk at preamp output with channel 2 Full Scale input.

             Ref 3 is Ch 1  -   3 mv  vs. 412 mv  43 db

             Ref 4 is Ch 3  -   4 mv vs. 412 mv   40 db



Fig 3.  Crosstalk at postamp input with channel 2 Full Scale input.

             Ref 3 is Ch 1   -  3 mv vs. 360 mv   41.6 db

             Ref 4 is Ch 3  -   4 mv vs 360 mv     39 db



      Fig 4.  Noise level at preamp output and postamp input of channel 1

      with Channel 2  Full Scale input to show noise relative to crosstalk.

       Ref 3 Ch 1 preamp out         7 mv pk

       Ref 4 Ch 1 postamp input    7 mv pk

   Note: This is the noise level of the FET probe used, Tektronix P6243.



B.  ECL receiver first stage with single ended coupling to the comparator input.

                           Channel 2 of postamp driven



Fig 5. Shows input waveform compared to stored waveform of Fig 1.

           This shows good input termination even at Full Scale input.



Fig 6. Linear Amplification   [  12 db attenuator setting ]

             Ch 1      comparator input  - 184 mv   gain  184/112 = 1.64

             Ch 3      output of channel 2 from ECL to NIM translator

Math 3  inverted and scaled Ch 1 for comparison with R 2 stored input 

                 waveform from Fig 1.



      Fig 7.  Saturated Amplifier. Same setup as Fig 6 with Full Scale input 

                                                   [ 2db attenuator setting ]

                  Inverted waveform is scaled to match the stored waveform risetime. 

                 Shows recovery time from saturation

                 Output saturates at 250 mv.



      Fig 8.  Crosstalk and Noise at comparator input of channel 1.

                     Ch 1  crosstalk    7 mv.

                     R   3  noise          8 mv pk

                     Ch 3  channel 2 output

                 Note: This is the noise level of the FET probe used, Tektronix P6243.



     Fig 9. Shorted Ch 2 input showing very low crosstalk

               Note: This is the noise level of the FET probe used, Tektronix P6243.



       Output Pulse Width versus input amplitude measured by Timer/Counter after 

                        threshold adjusted to give 26 nsec width at 22 db input for comparison

                        with inverting opamp circuit.  ( set at 11.2 mv )



                              32 db               16.55 nsec

                              22 db               26.03 nsec

                              12 db               31.90 nsec

                                2 db               36.85 nsec



C. ECL receiver first stage with differential coupling to the comparator.

                     Channel  4 driven



Fig 10.  +/- comparator input - linear amplification  [ 12 db attenuator setting]



Fig 11.  +/- comparator input - saturation [ Full Scale input  2db setting]



Fig.12.  Channel 3 crosstalk



Fig 13.  Channel 3 crosstalk - input shorted



D. Inverting Opamp first stage - Channel 1 & 2  Av = 6 - Ch 1 driven



Fig 14. Input termination compared to stored waveform



Fig 15. Comparator input at Full Scale



Fig 16. Crosstalk at Ch 2



Fig 17. Crosstalk at Ch 2 - input shorted



     Linearity of Channel 1 - DSO  Ch1 input, Ch 2 Comparator scaled to match M 3,

                                                    M 3 Ch 1 invert 



Fig 22.  Full Scale input - 298 mv/50 mv = Av = 5.96



Fig 23.  12 db setting  -                           150/25 = 6.0



Fig 24.  22 db setting -                              60/10 = 6.0



Fig 25.  32 db setting -                             60/10 = 6.0



Output Pulse Width versus input amplitude at 5 mv threshold re: input 

                                       [ set at 5mv X 6 = 30 mv ]

   Output width measured by Philips PM6654C timer/counter



Fig 26.  32 db                      16.5 nsec



Fig 27.  22 db                      26.0 nsec



Fig 28.  12 db                     31.64 nsec



Fig 29.   2 db                      35.7 nsec



 Output Pulse Jitter versus input amplitude



Fig 30.  32, 22, 12, 2 db



E. Inverting Opamp first stage - Channel 3 & 4 Av = 12  - Ch 4 driven



Fig 18.  Input termination - clamping Full Scale input and linear input 

                                                versus stored waveform.



Fig 19.  Comparator input at FullScale ( showing clamping ) and linear operation

                                                                 versus stored waveform.



Fig 20 Crosstalk Ch 3



Fig 21 Crosstalk Ch 3 - input shorted

1





3





Description: Fig1 , Filename: Fig1.eps

Description: Fig2 , Filename: Fig2.eps

Description: Fig3 , Filename: Fig3.eps

Description: Fig4 , Filename: Fig4.eps

Description: Fig5 , Filename: Fig5.eps

Description: Fig6 , Filename: Fig6.eps

Description: Fig7 , Filename: Fig7.eps

Description: Fig8 , Filename: Fig8.eps

Description: Fig9 , Filename: Fig9.eps

Description: Fig10 , Filename: Fig10.eps

Description: Fig11 , Filename: Fig11.eps

Description: Fig12 , Filename: Fig12.eps

Description: Fig13 , Filename: Fig13.eps

Description: Fig14 , Filename: Fig14.eps

Description: Fig15 , Filename: Fig15.eps

Description: Fig16 , Filename: Fig16.eps

Description: Fig17 , Filename: Fig17.eps

Description: Fig18 , Filename: Fig18.eps

Description: Fig19 , Filename: Fig19.eps

Description: Fig20 , Filename: Fig20.eps

Description: Fig21 , Filename: Fig21.eps

Description: Fig22 , Filename: Fig22.eps

Description: Fig23 , Filename: Fig23.eps

Description: Fig24 , Filename: Fig24.eps

Description: Fig25 , Filename: Fig25.eps

Description: Fig26 , Filename: Fig26.eps

Description: Fig27 , Filename: Fig27.eps

Description: Fig28 , Filename: Fig28.eps

Description: Fig29 , Filename: Fig29.eps

Description: Fig30 , Filename: Fig30.eps


Prototype Tests, Part 1 / John Schaapman

Created for the The Center for Subatomic Research E614 Project Projects Page.
Created by The CoCoBoard.