PhD Thesis -- TWIST Hardware -RPM 06.11.07 CHAPTER COMMENTS: There have been a number of improvements to the hardware since previous rounds; that's probably what I should focus on. Still need to describe all the Important Bits, of course, but at just enough detail to follow the analysis and systematics studies. (Remember forward references to the Systematics chapter in Appropriate Places.) Should the beamline info go here, or in another section? Probably just here; the details aren't that important to rho or delta, afaik, so I can likely get away with just a cursory description of where we get our muons (and what "surface muon" means) and what else other junk is in the beam. How much detail I go into in the t0 section (particularly wrt MC tests) will depend on what I find. If I see interesting quadratic structures and such, I'll need to show them so they'll make sense in the corresponding Systematics section. OTOH, it's probably important to show representative TDC spectra from data and MC, to show that the leading edges match well and the MC t0 measurement is meaningful. Actually, I can reference the TWIST NIM paper for a lot of this. I should skim that and see what's in it, so I know what I can reference there. For this chapter I want to keep it to the minimum the reader needs to understand everything else. Does Blair's thesis have info on hardware improvements? Or does he just describe things as they were in 2004? The TEC section can be pretty brief, mainly since I'm not especially sensitive to the beam profile. CHAPTER OUTLINE: - Overview - Show figure! - Core of TWIST is a symmetric stack of high-precision tracking chambers. - Polarized muons are stopped in a target at the centre. Decays are tracked and their momentum and angle are reconstructed. - Low mass reduces scattering and eloss, and allows the muons to reach the centre even at these low energies. - Strong 2 T magnetic field fixes the muon polarization in the face of scattering in the detector; muons encounter no material until they're well inside the field. - Brief overview of the chapter. - Beamline overview - Proton beam and production target - M13 - Beamline elements - Slits and jaws control rate and shape - Improved control software and readback (?) (*NEW*) - I think the dipole stabilizers were used for the first time in 2004. - Momentum selection will impact stopping distribution, important for both rho and delta. - Beam contents - cite my MSc thesis! because I can! *g* - Describe CPTOF. - Edge scan description. - Edge scan uses surface muon cutoff to calibrate momentum and dp/p of the beamline. - Show plot. (Probably my own.) - Muon beam monitor - Describe the TEC in brief. Cite TEC paper. - Should probably have a simple diagram of some sort. - Profiles taken for each set. - TEC (*NEW*) - Briefly describe the overall design and location. Mention low pressure etc. Reference the TEC paper for details. - Separate X and Y modules. Should have a diagram of a module, I suppose. - Drift times allow measurement of track location in each wire cell, giving position vs Z through the chamber -- provides position and angle information for the track. - Detector overview - Detector coordinate system - Magnet - Superconducting solenoid inside steel yoke - Field very uniform (quote uniformity level) - Opera simulation of field used for analysis and MC; accuracy checked with field map - Field map scaled to NMR probe readings - Gas degrader - Automatic adjustments by Slow Controls to maintain constant stopping distribution (*NEW*) - Trigger - M = M1+M2 - Alternate triggers for other uses (MLT, MTEC, PU, DS) - Chambers - Foil planes and wire planes - Need diagrams: - Wire plane orientation - Side view of the detector [done] - Now instrumenting the full Dense Stack! (*NEW*) - Precision of wire placement (by hand, by yours truly!) - Asymmetric construction - Bulges - Online monitoring (*NEW*) - Citals for Z locations - Now accounting for exact cital sizes in simulation and analysis (*NEW*) - DCs vs PCs - Mention Dense Stack - Pre-amps (VTX), post-amps, and FastBus TDCs (see Jim's thesis, p.35) - DC STRs - TEC - Stopping target - Mention support structure, kapton masks, etc. Diagram would be useful. - Point out the much better knowledge of the aluminum target vs the graphite/mylar one. (*NEW*) - We still avoid using the region with the kapton masks etc. - Control software (integrate with above sections, don't need to describe separately...) - Misc control software (EPICS, Tcl) - DAQ - MIDAS, on Linux - Slow controls - with interface to MIDAS - Calibration - Alignment - Rough overview of alignment techniques. Don't need much details, since I didn't have anything to do with this side of it; this'll probably fit in a couple of paragraphs. - Now using 44-plane alignment! (*NEW*) - Investigate whether the B-field alignment was used at all for the 2002 analysis. (*NEW*) - Final alignment precision (trans, rot, B-field). - t0 - Rough overview of technique. Again, keep it brief. (***Was this technique improved between the two analyses?) - Include MC and data TDC spectra, emphasizing leading edge shape, since we're using MC to get the t0 systematic for data.